Evaluation of birth weight in comparison to other anthropometric parameters to detect low birth weight

  • Md. Selim Khan Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Rajshahi Medical College, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
  • Mst. Afroza Khatun Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Rajshahi Medical College, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
  • M. H. Tarafder Junior Consultant (Pediatrics), Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
  • Rawshan Akhtar Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rajshahi Medical College, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
  • Nasim Parvej Medical Officer, Upazilla Health Complex, Mohonpur, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
  • Anika Ahmed Medical Officer, Upazilla Health Complex, Paba, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
  • Saklayen Ferdous EMO, Mohammad Ali Hospital, Bogura, Bangladesh
Keywords: BW-birth weight, LBW-low birth weight, CC-chest circumference, MAC-mid-arm circumference, OFC- occipito-frontal circumference, SGA- small for gestational age, IUGR- intrauterine growth retardation

Abstract

Background: Birth weight is an important determinant of child survival and development. Low birth weight is a major health problem in developing countries. Identification of low-birth-weight babies in the community and their screening to ascertain required level of care is very important to achieve normal goals in child survival. A large proportion of deliveries take place at home and there is need to develop simple, inexpensive, non-invasive and practical methods to identify LBW newborns soon after birth. The study was aimed to evaluate the relative usefulness and validity of chest, arm and occipito-frontal circumferences and to correlate them with birth weight to identify LBW babies.  Objectives: To evaluate birth weight in comparison to other anthropometric parameters for detection of low-birth-weight babies. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted among the low birth weight babies admitted in the Pediatric wards and the low birth weight babies born in the Obstetrics wards of Rajshahi Medical college hospital to evaluate birth weight in comparison to other anthropometric parameters to detect low birth weight by measuring birth weight (BW) at or just after birth, chest circumference (CC), mid-arm circumference (MAC), occipito-frontal circumference (OFC) and to find suitable surrogates for low birth weight by comparing different parameters. Results: 350 LBW newborns were studied. Their mean CC, OFC and MAC were 30.05cm, 31.61cm and 9.68cm respectively. Mean BW was 1975gm. There was significant relationship between birth weight and gestational age (p =<0.001), chest, mid-arm and occipito-frontal circumferences (p =<0.001). There was a positive correlation of birth weight to anthropometric parameters like chest, mid-arm and occipito-frontal circumferences but the highest correlation coefficient was found with mid-arm circumference (BW-MAC: r = 0.90, BW-CC: r = 0.75 and BW-OFC: r = 0.83).  Mid – arm and chest circumferences were very good anthropometric surrogates of LBW. But MAC was the best surrogate (r = 0-90) to detect LBW babies. Conclusion: Anthropometric values are simple, practicable, quick and reliable indicators for early detection of LBW newborns in a community. MAC in our perspective can effectively be used as a surrogate for LBW.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization, Low Birth Weight: A tabulation of available information, WHO/MCH/92.2, World Health Organization, Geneva, and UNICEF, New York, 1992.

Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF. Low birth weight in the United States. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2007 Feb 1; 85 (2):584S-90S.

Wilcox AJ. On the importance—and the unimportance—of birth weight. International journal of epidemiology. 2001 Dec 1; 30 (6):1233-41.

Kliegman, Stanton. St. Geme and Schor. ‘Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, 20 ed.: Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd; 2016.

UNICEF B. National Low Birth Weight Survey of Bangladesh 2003–2004. Planning Division MOP, editor. Dhaka. 2005 Sep.

Blanc AK, Wardlaw T. Monitoring low birth weight: an evaluation of international estimates and an updated estimation procedure. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2005; 83:178-85d.

State of world children, UNICEF-2004, available at http://www.unicef.org/publications/ index.html

Lissauer T, Fanaroff AA, Miall L, Fanaroff J, editors. Neonatology at a Glance. John Wiley & Sons; 2020 May 11.

Wardlaw TM, editor. Low birth weight: country, regional and global estimates. Unicef; 2004.

Diamond I, McDonald J, Guidotti R. Use of a simple anthropometric measure to predict birth weight. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1993; 71(2):157-63.

Taksande A, Vilhekar KY, Chaturvedi P, Gupta S, Deshmukh P. Predictor of low birth weight babies by anthropometry. Journal of tropical pediatrics. 2007 Dec 1; 53(6):420-3.

WHO, Demographic and health surveys Nigeria, 2009

Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J, Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? The lancet. 2005 Mar 5; 365(9462):891-900.

Adimora GN. Contribution of low Birth Weight and Very Low Birth Weight Infants to Perinatal Mortality at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu Nigeria. International Journal of Medicine and Health Development. 2002; 7(2):124-7.

Kuti O, Orji EO, Ogunlola IO. Analysis of perinatal mortality in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2003 Jan 1; 23(5):512-4.

Uthman OA. Effect of low birth weight on infant mortality: analysis using Weibull hazard model. Int J of Epidemiol. 2008; 6(1):8.

Blanc AK, Wardlaw T. Monitoring low birth weight: an evaluation of international estimates and an updated estimation procedure. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2005; 83:178-85d.

Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, De Bernis L, Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? The Lancet. 2005 Mar 12; 365(9463):977-88.

Bhargava SK, Ramji S, Kumar A, Mohan MA, Marwah J, Sachdev HP. Mid-arm and chest circumferences at birth as predictors of low birth weight and neonatal mortality in the community. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Dec 7; 291(6509):1617-9.

Naik DB, Kulkarni AP, Aswar NR. Birth weight and anthropometry of newborns. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2003 Feb; 70(2):145-6.

Mohsen MA, Youssef MM, Zaki ST, El-Shamy MM. Mid-upper arm, chest and head circumference cut-off points and equations for identifying low birth weight in Egypt. International Journal of Food, Nutrition and Public Health. 2011; 4(1):31.

Ezeaka VC, Egri-Okwaji MT, Renner JK, Grange AO. Anthropometric measurements in the detection of low birth weight infants in Lagos. The Nigerian postgraduate medical journal. 2003 Sep 1; 10(3):168-72.

Kh HT. Detection of Low Birth-Weight Newborns by Anthropometric Measurements In Iran. Acta Medica Iranica. 1996:43-5.

Huque F, Hussain Z. Detection of low birth-weight new born babies by anthropometric measurements in Bangladesh. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 1991 Mar; 58 (2): 223-31.

Verma SS, Ghadiok AK, Kishore N, Singh OP. Head and chest circumferences as predictors of low birth weight in Indian babies. Journal of tropical pediatrics. 1996 Jun 1; 42(3):146-50.

Mullany LC, Darmstadt GL, Coffey P, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Tielsch JM. A low cost, colour coded, hand held spring scale accurately categorises birth weight in low resource settings. Archives of disease in childhood. 2006 May 1; 91(5):410-3.

Georgieff MK, Sasanow SR, Chockalingam UM, Pereira GR. A comparison of the mid‐arm circumference/head circumference ratio and ponderal index for the evaluation of newborn infants after abnormal intrauterine growth. Acta Pædiatrica. 1988 Mar;77(2):214-9.

Prasad SR S, Mohan M, Kumar A, Kapani V. Intra-uterine growth curves for midarm and thigh circumferences. Indian pediatrics. 1989 Apr 1; 26(4):343-7.

World Health Organization. Perinatal mortality: a listing of available information. World Health Organization; 1996.

Mehta S, Tandon A, Dua T, Kumari S, Singh SK. Clinical assessment of nutritional status at birth. Indian pediatrics. 1998 May 1; 35(5):423-8.

Das, J.C., Anthropometric Parameters of Newborn Infants. JCMCTA 2012; 23(2): 38-41

Sajjadian N, Shajari H, Rahimi F, Jahadi R, Barakat MG. Anthropometric measurements at birth as predictor of low birth weight. Health. 2011 Dec 8; 3(12):752-6.

Sood SL, Saiprasad GS, Wilson CG. Mid arm circumference at birth: a screening method for detection of low birth weight. Indian pediatrics. 2002 Sep 1; 39(9):838-41.

Arisoy AE, Sarman G. Chest and mid-arm circumferences: identification of low birth weight newborns in Turkey. Journal of tropical pediatrics. 1995 Feb 1; 41(1):34-7.

Dhar B, Mowlah G, Nahar S, Islam N. Birth-weight status of newborns and its relationship with other anthropometric parameters in a public maternity hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2002 Mar 1:36-41.

Sharma JN, Sharma BS, Gupta ML, Saxena S, Sharma U. Mid-arm circumference at birth as a predictor of low birth weight babies and early neonatal mortality. Indian pediatrics. 1986; 23(11):915-9.

Kaur H, Bansal R. Anthropometric determinants of low birth weight in newborns of Hoshiarpur district (Punjab)-A hospital based study. Human Biology Review, vol. 1(4), 376-6.

CITATION
DOI: 10.26838/MEDRECH.2022.9.6.650
Published: 2022-11-25
How to Cite
1.
Khan MS, Khatun MA, Tarafder MH, Akhtar R, Parvej N, Ahmed A, Ferdous S. Evaluation of birth weight in comparison to other anthropometric parameters to detect low birth weight. Med. res. chronicles [Internet]. 2022Nov.25 [cited 2024Mar.29];9(6):517-25. Available from: https://medrech.com/index.php/medrech/article/view/631
Section
Original Research Article